Biden’s progress with the country reminds me of when I have to write a paper and I decide it would be the greatest time ever to clean my room instead. I have a chronic illness, and it was there in high school and college, and a lot of the time I couldn’t do anything at all. It’s like that with Biden and Congress—the Republican House majority makes it hard to get anything done that would help us claw our way out of the downward spiral we’re in right now. A little win is a win, but in the long-term, we’re probably sliding backwards.
Link referenced at image’s source link:
New HHS Actions and Research Highlight How President Biden’s Administration is Lowering Prescription Drug Costs
Hypothesis: I think Trump was never actually President and the identity of the real President was censored because...with fake news, at some point the government would have chosen to uphold the spirit of the law regarding fair elections and stepped in and filtered all social media posts to ensure fake news, misunderstandings, racism, etc. don’t end up swinging the election. If it wasn’t a safeguard already in place at the time, it would be by now. It also might have come about due to AI generated images possibly being presented as evidence in court. Even before that, there was Photoshop.
Is it a psychological experiment?
Can't companies use AI filters on social media posts now so people can’t lie and say that something is real when it isn’t? Companies can’t lie or they go to court…how would it not be libel/slander and a crime?
This is what I’m focusing on. Being a good person and advocating for humanitarian funding to, if it’s safe enough, reach innocent bystanders on both sides.
How is this not some fake news story or a post on one-time-I-dreamt? How is this anything that Republicans value—patriotism, doing the right thing, keeping our country secure? It’s almost like the Republican Party has turned into a party of kamikaze terrorists, but they’re so obvious about it it feels like a dream where your body’s trying to wake you up by giving you obvious clues it’s a dream but everyone in your dream is gaslighting you into thinking everything’s normal.
Reddit Post: “I really hope we are not on the time line where Trump is president when AGI is reached. Imagine what he'd do with that power, what that world would look like”
The government should be allowed to start its own brand. Say that the government thinks a town or neighborhood needs more cheap food options. The government could open up a cheap grocery store, start cheap fast food franchises, lease a space to vendors to all sell food in one place, etc. If they thought somewhere needed cheap clothing options, they could open up a government-brand superstore with cheap clothes that people in the area would buy. If they thought they needed a private school for kids who want to do well in school and need to be taught separately from everyone else so they can move through material faster, they could open up a government-brand private school. They’d try to establish cheap options for needed resources, then they could move on to conquering mid-range and luxury brands. For administrative positions, they could use an advanced AI that’s currently being kept classified and was developed by government employees instead of private companies that always seem to be running out of money…and give all the profits earned back to the government. Since automation is almost here anyway, doing this would solve a lot of problems. Ethically, it would be similar to a famous billionaire starting his own company and having enough money to stay afloat long enough to draw in lifetime customers by starting off with really cheap prices. It’s a way to solve the automation/UBI/where’s the money for UBI even going to come from? argument while also giving other people the chance to start their own companies and try to fill in the map before the government establishes the businesses that are in need first.
If this is done, it will help people save money, add to the money the government can use to spend on its people, keep jobs in America instead of outsourcing as much of it as they can, and create a self-sustaining infrastructure that Americans will have access to in case of an emergency like war with China.
Edit: Lol a news article about this just came up in my Apple News thing. The one that came up on my phone was from Fox. For some reason I can’t find people talking about it in a subreddit for Democrats.
How to prep for memory problems: be overly polite. If you think you might have burped, say excuse me. If you did burp, good, you excused yourself and are now known as one of the more polite old people in the neighborhood. If you don't, then because you didn't prep (to whatever extent possible), you’re now one of the old people that’s a little bit harder to be around. Do your part to make other people's lives easier and more comfortable, and they'll be more likely to help you if anything happens.
This article describes the people who either ignored barriers or took dirt road out of their doomed town. The part at the end about all the kids who died while home alone from cancelled school made me cry and realize if schools are closed for any hazardous conditions don’t let your boss sucker you into coming into work. These children died because conditions were too hazardous for school but not other workplaces apparently.
Reddit Commenter: I work in a chemical manufacturing environment where alarms are used to signal problems.
You should always assume that most people who hear the alarm won't know what it means.
This is a blindspot in most manufacturing environments, which leads to a ton of inappropriate responses. People running down hallways because they confuse an alarm that just warns that water temperature to the sewer is slightly too warm. People ignore pending emergency release alarms for a few minutes because they can't tell the difference between that and an actual emergency. (Edit: Just because there are different alarms doesn't mean that difference won't be misconstrued!)
Mostly, when alarms are just a Ding or siren, people waste time trying to figure out what the alarm means, instead of trying to solve the problem.
Simple sirens and dings are low effort, and slightly cheaper, so we run with it. I guaranfuckingtee you that in the face of this disaster, most city planner people will think the problem is an education one, and will waste time and money teaching half the citizens of their district something they'll forget in a year.
The only solution to this problem is to buy long range focused speakers that SAY exactly what the fuck is going on. Here is a video clip of one of these LRAD devices in action, from a helicopter. The first voice is from a megaphone. The second is from an LRAD
All of the following are a hell of a lot better than sorting out "Was that three seconds between repeating WheeeeWhoooos? Or was that 2 Wheewoos in quick succession followed by a pause and two more Wheewoos?
"ATTENTION. THERE IS A TORNADO WARNING UNTIL 3:15PM. SEEK SHELTER INDOORS IMMEDIATELY."
"ATTENTION. THERE IS A TSUNAMI WARNING. MOVE TO HIGH GROUND IMMEDIATELY.
"ATTENTION. THIS IS A TEST ALARM. THIS IS ONLY A TEST. THANK YOU AND HAVE A SAFE DAY."
ATTENTION. THERE IS A WILDFIRE FORECAST TO HIT THIS AREA IN THE NEXT 30 MINUTES. GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE."
If you work in manufacturing, community preparedness, or anywhwere with a control room, please make an effort to push for priority alarms that have a readout instead of a Ding. Lives depend on it.
It’s clear as day in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution, which states:
“No person shall … hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, … who, having previously taken an oath … to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”
This requirement has already been applied to remove from public office Cowboys for Trump co-founder and former Otero County Commissioner Couy Griffin in New Mexico.
Griffin was found guilty of a misdemeanor for engaging in insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, though he did not go inside the building. In doing so, Griffin violated his oath to “support and uphold the Constitution and laws of the State of New Mexico, and the Constitution of the United States.” The initial ruling removed Griffin from office immediately, and on appeal, the ruling was upheld by the New Mexico Supreme Court.
The 14th Amendment applies to any elected official -- whether a County Commissioner or the President of the United States. That means, it includes Donald Trump -- the person who directed an armed mob to march on the Capitol in an attempt to stop the certification of electors and the peaceful transfer of power.
At his Inauguration in 2017, Trump took an oath to protect the U.S. Constitution. Four years later, he violated that oath with his efforts to remain in office after losing reelection.
The violent insurrection was the culmination of a months-long project to try to overturn the results of a free and fair election. Trump tried to intimidate state officials into reversing the election by “finding” votes that did not exist. He recruited “alternative” slates of electors to cast unauthorized votes for him in the Electoral College. He invited extremists to the Capitol on January 6 to try to prevent the formal counting of electoral votes. And then, having been informed that members of the crowd were carrying deadly weapons, he sent them to the Capitol building -- which they invaded, threatening to find and assassinate lawmakers.
Trump continued to provide aid and comfort to the hundreds of assailants actively assaulting police officers when he did nothing but watch the extreme physical violence he had unleashed unfold on television.
According to sworn testimony by his closest aides, President Trump refused to call in the National Guard or any other support for the Capitol police, who were literally fighting for their lives to protect the lives of those within the building. Not only that, he tweeted further criticism of his own vice president, literally stoking the cries of “Hang Mike Pence!”
Trump’s betrayal of the Constitution is unconscionable and -- while the attempted coup was unsuccessful -- it led to the deaths of at least five people and severe injuries of hundreds more.
It was an insurrection. It was violent. It was a violation of Trump’s oath of office.
The 14th Amendment is clear, Trump is disqualified and must be barred from serving in elected office in America ever again. Sign the petition to tell election officials to keep Trump off the ballot now.
Turning offices to residences is touted as a housing fix for a work-from-home era, but a $520,000 listing takes the brief too literally
The article says it’s too expensive compared to what you can get for that amount of money in the area, and I believe them. However, besides the price, there isn’t much to complain about. No counter space can be solved with shelving or a shower caddy or even a spice rack. New carpet isn’t necessary and can be covered with area rugs. Glass walls on the outside and in can be covered with a curtain rod and opaque curtains. Condos (which you own, unlike apartments, which you rent) can probably also have the internal glass replaced with a wall if someone’s willing to spend the money. Ideally, office spaces converted to condos or apartments should be done as cheaply as possible with the option of buying additional items like curtains and shelving so that they can get the selling price as low as possible.
Regarding the Uglies series by Scott Westerfeld (please write as much as you can on each subject while being concise, using multiple reply messages as necessary):
[The Pretty Committee] Citizens must abide by their city’s Pretty standards of surgery—even if you were tall to begin with, after surgery, you can’t be too tall because otherwise other Pretties in the city would die of congestive heart failure?
Can’t have too high of cheekbones because their organs would get pulled and hurt?
Can’t have cat eyes for the same reason—plus they wouldn’t be able to see?
Immune system boost doesn’t print out new organs for them?
Or is it something to do with their brains/nerves(?)?
Hair can’t be too dark or too light—why?
Same with eyes?
What if they’re white with iridescent glitter?
What if white eyes are found to be scientifically the most attractive (as I think they are)?
Are the no extreme lightness/darkness standards evidence of brainwashing/lesions?
What about eyes, hair, and skin that can change color without needing to surge?
What if they change color depending on the weather?
What if they had genetic doping/engineering and were making people stupid—would this have been a much different story?
Is that justified since you’d need a government to perform the surgeries either way (unless the surgeons/scientist it’s ran away and brought supplies with them like Maddy and Az)?
How would a story with the same characters play out if the only difference was instead of everyone getting plastic surgery at 16, they got genetically doped?
ChatGPT:
Height: The surgery ensures that Pretties don't become too tall, as excessive height could lead to congestive heart failure in other Pretties. This restriction helps maintain a balance in the population's physical characteristics.
Cheekbones: The surgery limits the height of cheekbones to prevent organ displacement or discomfort. Extreme changes in facial structure could potentially disrupt the functioning of internal organs.
Cat eyes: Cat-like eyes are not desirable because they could hinder vision and cause potential harm. The focus is on preserving functionality and avoiding any risks associated with altered eye structures.
Immune system boost: The surgery doesn't involve printing out new organs. Its purpose is to enhance the immune system and improve overall health, rather than replacing or modifying specific organs.
Brain and nerves: While the series doesn't explicitly mention surgery's effects on the brain or nerves, the focus is primarily on physical appearance and health rather than cognitive or neurological changes.
Hair and eye color: The restrictions on hair and eye color aim to maintain a certain aesthetic balance within the society. Extreme variations in color may be considered unconventional or unattractive by the standards set by the Pretty Committee.
White iridescent glitter eyes: While white eyes with iridescent glitter may be visually striking, it is not specified how such a trait would be perceived within the society of the Uglies series. Beauty standards in the series are dictated by the Pretty Committee, which emphasizes a specific set of criteria.
Brainwashing/lesions: The absence of extreme lightness or darkness standards does not necessarily indicate brainwashing or lesions. It could simply reflect the preferences and aesthetic choices of the society portrayed in the series.
Color-changing features: Natural color-changing abilities in eyes, hair, or skin without the need for surgery are not explored in the Uglies series. The focus is primarily on the societal impact of surgical transformations and the themes of conformity and individuality.
Genetic doping/engineering: If the story involved genetic doping or engineering instead of plastic surgery, it would introduce a significant change in the narrative. Genetic modifications could potentially impact various aspects, such as physical abilities, intelligence, or personality traits. The dynamics among the characters and their choices would likely be different, exploring the consequences and ethics of genetic manipulation rather than cosmetic surgery.
Government and surgeries: In both scenarios, whether it's plastic surgery or genetic manipulation, a governing body or authority would likely be involved in overseeing and performing the procedures. The role of the government in maintaining control and enforcing societal norms is a central aspect of the Uglies series.
Me:
Instead of thinking about [what] the author would conclude/emphasize/explore, talk about the most likely scenarios (and their order of likelihood) given the characters’ personalities are the same as in the original story.
ChatGPT:
Rebellion against genetic manipulation: The characters, particularly Tally Youngblood and her friends, have shown a strong inclination towards questioning and rebelling against the oppressive nature of their society. It is likely that they would also resist genetic doping, considering the potential loss of individuality, autonomy, and the ethical implications of such modifications. They would probably form a resistance movement to fight against the government's control over genetic engineering.
Pursuit of freedom and self-discovery: Just as in the original series, the characters would strive for personal freedom and self-discovery. They might embark on a journey to find alternative solutions or a place where genetic doping is not enforced. Their quest would involve challenging the existing norms, seeking independence, and exploring their true identities.
Dilemmas and moral conflicts: The characters, especially Tally, have been known to grapple with moral dilemmas throughout the original series. If genetic doping were introduced, they would face new ethical challenges related to the manipulation of human traits and potential consequences on society. This could lead to internal conflicts and the need to make difficult choices.
Unintended consequences: Genetic manipulation often carries unintended consequences. The characters might encounter unexpected side effects or discover hidden agendas behind the genetic engineering practices of their society. They would uncover the risks associated with tampering with human genetics and the negative impacts it has on individuals and the broader community.
Collaborative alliances: Just as in the original story, the characters would likely form alliances with like-minded individuals who share their concerns about genetic doping. They would join forces to resist and expose the government's genetic manipulation agenda, forming a network of rebels and allies to fight against the system.
Exploration of personal identity: The characters' journey of self-discovery would delve into questions of personal identity and the true nature of humanity. They would navigate the complexities of their own genetic enhancements, examining whether their identities are shaped by their genetic makeup or their choices and experiences.
Me:
You talked a lot about the similarities the stories would share. What differences would take place, plot-wise? Not just substituting “genetic manipulation” for “plastic surgery.”
ChatGPT:
Ethical dilemmas and scientific debates: The introduction of genetic doping would bring forth new ethical dilemmas and scientific debates. The characters would engage in discussions about the boundaries of genetic manipulation, its consequences on individuality and society, and the potential risks associated with altering human genes. These debates could drive the plot and influence character motivations and decisions.
Genetic rebellion and underground movements: Instead of focusing primarily on physical appearance and societal conformity, the story would likely involve a rebellion against genetic manipulation itself. Characters would seek ways to resist and counteract the government's control over genetic enhancements. Underground movements or secret societies might form, aiming to protect natural genetic diversity and human autonomy.
Exploration of genetic limitations and flaws: The characters would delve into the limitations and flaws of genetic doping. They might discover that genetic enhancements come with unforeseen drawbacks, such as increased susceptibility to certain diseases or a loss of emotional depth and complexity. These revelations could challenge the characters' beliefs and prompt them to question the desirability of genetic manipulation.
Uncovering government conspiracies: In addition to the existing themes of government control and manipulation, the story would involve uncovering government conspiracies related to genetic engineering. The characters might stumble upon hidden agendas, such as the intentional suppression of intelligence or the creation of a genetically obedient population. Unraveling these conspiracies could become a central plot point.
Genetic diversity as a source of strength: While the original series highlighted the beauty of individuality, a story focused on genetic doping would emphasize the value of genetic diversity as a source of strength. The characters would recognize that natural genetic variation contributes to adaptability, resilience, and the evolution of humanity. They would work to protect and celebrate this diversity rather than conforming to a standardized genetic template.
Expanding the scope of scientific exploration: Genetic manipulation would open up new avenues for scientific exploration within the story. The characters might encounter scientists or researchers who are experimenting with different genetic modifications, both beneficial and detrimental. This expanded scientific backdrop could introduce more complex ethical dilemmas and raise questions about the responsible use of genetic technology.
Redefining beauty and identity: The concept of beauty would likely undergo a significant shift. Instead of focusing solely on physical appearance, the characters would explore the complexities of identity in a world where genetic traits can be altered. The story would delve into the internal struggle between one's genetically enhanced self and the search for genuine self-acceptance and personal identity beyond genetic modifications.
Me:
What are some details that might be unexpected to sci-fi fans familiar with cyberpunk dystopias like Edgerunners, particularly regarding the differences between the Pretty Committee standards in Tally’s city vs. Diego?
ChatGPT:
Focus on physical appearance: While both settings feature dystopian societies, the emphasis on physical appearance in the Pretty Committee standards of Tally's city might be unexpected for fans of cyberpunk. Cyberpunk dystopias often revolve around themes of technology, virtual realities, and societal oppression, whereas the Uglies series explores the consequences of a beauty-obsessed society and the pressure to conform to physical ideals.
Lack of cybernetic enhancements: In many cyberpunk settings, characters often have cybernetic enhancements, such as robotic limbs or augmented reality interfaces. However, in Tally's city, the focus is on surgically altering physical features rather than incorporating technological augmentations into the body. This distinction highlights the divergence between the two genres in terms of the approach to modifying and enhancing human capabilities.
Absence of advanced technology: In Edgerunners and other cyberpunk stories, advanced technology is usually pervasive, influencing every aspect of society. In contrast, the Uglies series presents a world that is not as technologically advanced. While certain technologies exist, such as hoverboards and advanced medical procedures, the society in Tally's city relies more on traditional surgical techniques rather than high-tech enhancements.
Government-controlled beauty standards: The Pretty Committee in Tally's city establishes and enforces the beauty standards that citizens must adhere to through mandatory surgery. This centralized control over appearance is distinct from the often decentralized power structures and corporate dominance seen in many cyberpunk dystopias, where multiple factions or corporations vie for control.
Limited exploration of virtual reality: In cyberpunk narratives, virtual reality and immersive digital worlds are commonly explored. However, in the Uglies series, virtual reality is not a central focus. The story primarily centers around physical transformations, personal identity, and societal norms, with minimal emphasis on the digital realm.
Ideals of conformity and rebellion: While both settings involve elements of conformity and rebellion, the motivations and dynamics differ. In cyberpunk, rebellion often arises from marginalized groups challenging oppressive systems. In the Uglies series, rebellion is driven by characters questioning the superficiality and control imposed by the beauty standards, aiming for individuality and freedom of choice.
Me:
Diego was the city in Specials, the last book in the official Uglies trilogy.
I think it’s interesting how you mentioned that Tally’s city (Seatac) isn’t as technologically advanced, and virtual reality is nonexistent. Uglies takes place in a post-apocalyptic society, and things like a “hole in the wall” that produces customized clothing on-demand let the reader know that in terms of goods and money, it’s essentially a post-scarcity world. Perhaps virtual reality exists but isn’t as enjoyable to the Pretties as living out their real-world fantasies that they’ve had since they were kids.
What advances in technology and public policy result in the easiest path to a world like Tally’s (minus the lesions/brainwashing and restrictions) as opposed to a world where one’s fantasies can only be lived out virtually? Would self-replicating nanos be enough, or would this result in unforeseen consequences like a refusal to work (which might be unnecessary anyway as robotics would be widespread and available on-demand) or follow society’s laws and ethics (would mind control be necessary then? Or would cameras and police drones be sufficient?) or a depletion of natural resources (explored in the fourth installment in the Uglies series, Extras—the protagonist’s city decided to run on a “reputation economy,” in which every person became a blogger/influencer/YouTube star and those with the most views got the best apartments)—I’m not sure how self-replicating nanos work, but if everything including air and water could be produced from them, perhaps this wouldn’t be an issue?
ChatGPT:
Advanced fabrication technology: Self-replicating nanos or similar advanced fabrication technology could indeed be a significant factor. If these nanos were capable of efficiently producing a wide range of goods, including customized clothing and other necessities, it could contribute to a post-scarcity environment where material resources are readily available. This could reduce the incentive for individuals to prioritize virtual experiences over real-world fulfillment.
Robotic automation: Widespread adoption of advanced robotics and automation would play a crucial role in eliminating the need for human labor in mundane or repetitive tasks. This would free individuals to pursue their passions and real-world fantasies without the burden of traditional work. With the availability of on-demand robotics, people could focus on creative endeavors or engage in meaningful pursuits aligned with their interests.
Surveillance and enforcement: Maintaining law and order in such a society would require a combination of surveillance technologies, such as cameras and drones, along with efficient enforcement mechanisms. While mind control may not be necessary, robust surveillance systems could help ensure compliance with societal laws and ethics, preventing potential abuses or disruptions. The key would be striking a balance between maintaining order and respecting individual privacy and freedom.
Resource management and sustainability: With the introduction of self-replicating nanos, there would indeed be a need for careful resource management to prevent depletion. Advanced technology and sustainable practices, such as recycling, renewable energy sources, and responsible consumption, would be essential to maintain a balance between resource availability and environmental preservation. This would help address concerns about resource scarcity and ensure long-term sustainability.
Reputation-based economy: As depicted in the Uglies series' fourth installment, Extras, a reputation-based economy could be a potential framework. In such a system, individuals' social influence and contributions to society, measured through various metrics like views or engagement, could determine their access to resources and privileges. This approach could incentivize participation, creativity, and the pursuit of real-world accomplishments rather than relying solely on virtual experiences.
Me:
Would self-replicating nanos be able to become air, water, food, etc.?
ChatGPT:
Self-replicating nanos, as a hypothetical technology, have the potential to perform a wide range of tasks, including the creation or transformation of various substances. However, the ability to transform raw materials into complex substances like air, water, or food would present significant challenges.
Air, for instance, is a mixture of different gases, including nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide, and trace elements. Creating and maintaining a breathable atmosphere would require precise control over gas compositions and ratios, as well as the ability to filter impurities.
Water is a compound composed of hydrogen and oxygen. While it is technically feasible to break down other molecules to obtain these elements, the challenge lies in ensuring a sustainable supply of these elements over time. It would also require efficient filtration and purification mechanisms to ensure the water's safety for consumption.
Food production involves the complex synthesis of organic compounds, including carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids. While self-replicating nanos could potentially contribute to the production of basic building blocks, the creation of fully nutritious and diverse food options would require a deep understanding of biology, genetics, and nutritional requirements.
The development of self-replicating nanos that can efficiently and reliably transform raw materials into air, water, or food at a large scale is a significant technological hurdle. It would require sophisticated control systems, precise molecular manipulation, and comprehensive knowledge of various scientific disciplines.
Additionally, there would be concerns related to safety, quality control, and potential unintended consequences. The potential risks associated with self-replication and the potential for the nanos to become uncontrolled or malfunctioning would need to be carefully considered and addressed.
While self-replicating nanos hold theoretical promise, it is important to approach their capabilities and limitations with caution. The feasibility of transforming raw materials into essential resources like air, water, and food goes beyond the current understanding and technological capabilities.
Me:
Couldn’t potential risks associated with self-replication be mitigated by first educating the public, then creating infrastructure for policing and assistance, broadcasting and streaming every step along the way?
Also, in terms of mind control, wireless mind-reading (brain computer interface) technology already exists. Whether classified technology exists that goes beyond that is unknown, although people with educated opinions on the matter tend to gravitate towards believing classified technology is decades ahead of what’s available to the public as opposed to ahead by a few months or years.
Also, I believe that eventually, with objective education, future generations will grow up understanding that interacting with others in the real world unnecessarily exposes them to illness and dangerous health risks like car crashes and environmental hazards. The ideal environment to ensure maximum lifelong safety would be an underground bomb shelter, probably while being suspended in amniotic solution similar to the movie The Matrix. This would ensure protection from malnutrition and disease as well as more existential threats like nuclear war and climate change. Although people may at first desire being able to switch back and forth between interacting with others in the real world and remaining safe underground, I believe that by being educated on both sides of the argument, future generations will eventually realize that completely immersive technology is no different than face-to-face interaction, and it’s not worth playing Russian Roulette with your life every time you step outside. What are your thoughts on this? What else should I be taking into account?
ChatGPT:
Mitigating potential risks associated with self-replication would indeed require a comprehensive approach, including education, infrastructure, and regulation. Educating the public about the benefits, limitations, and responsible use of self-replicating nanos would be crucial to foster understanding and informed decision-making.
Creating infrastructure for monitoring, regulation, and assistance could help ensure that self-replicating nanos are used safely and responsibly. This would involve establishing mechanisms for oversight, quality control, and addressing any unforeseen issues that may arise. Broadcasting and streaming the steps along the way could contribute to transparency and public awareness, enhancing accountability and trust.
Regarding mind control and brain-computer interface technology, it is true that advancements in these areas exist to some extent. However, the capabilities and implications of such technologies are still being explored and understood. While it is challenging to determine the extent of classified technology, it is reasonable to consider that classified advancements may be ahead of what is publicly available. Speculation about classified technologies should be approached with caution, as concrete information may be limited.
Your perspective on the ideal environment for safety, such as underground shelters and suspended animation, raises interesting points. It is important to acknowledge that individuals' perceptions of safety and their willingness to engage in face-to-face interaction versus immersive technology can vary greatly. Balancing safety with human connection and personal fulfillment is a complex societal consideration.
However, it is worth noting that human beings are inherently social creatures, and face-to-face interaction often provides unique experiences, emotional connections, and social bonds that cannot be fully replicated by technology. The desire for human connection and the inherent need for physical and social interaction may persist, even in a world where immersive technology offers perceived safety and convenience.
As you explore these ideas, it is essential to consider multiple perspectives, including the potential psychological and societal implications of prolonged isolation, the value of physical experiences, and the dynamic nature of societal values and preferences over time. Striking a balance between safety, human connection, personal autonomy, and societal well-being is a complex challenge that requires ongoing dialogue, research, and consideration of ethical and practical factors.
Me:
I don’t think that these concerns will ever fully go away. Instead, I foresee people willing to risk their lives eventually becoming a minority, until their numbers are so small that they are perceived the way we perceive the Amish and Christian Scientists (who refuse all medicine due to a religious rejection of technology) today. At first, people who decide to spend as much time as possible in fully realistic virtual reality might be seen as a small outlier subculture, the way people who liked to use the internet when it was first becoming widespread were perceived by popular culture—nerdy with no friends. This may be especially true due to the use of full dive VR for pornographic purposes. However, over time, as new uses for VR come about, people will get pulled in one-by-one—first, through dating, then parties and concerts, then casual hanging out with friends, then to replace offices at work, then to experience choose-your-own-adventure TV shows and movies, for example. People may even wish to move to communities, cities, or colleges where VR is more accepted and encouraged, allowing the subculture to gain more media exposure and become mainstream as they appeal to a number of different people’s interests and desired experiences. I believe that this will come first, then people will start taking into account things like car accident statistics and shootings deaths, resulting in children who are educated on the risks and benefits before they’re allowed access to the aspects of VR that people tend to enjoy most. It will then shape their views of their desired adulthood, and finally then will the last large segment of society that can afford it become full-time VR users—people who typically grow up sheltered, well-educated, and well-off.
ChatGPT:
Your perspective on the potential evolution and acceptance of virtual reality (VR) culture is an interesting one. It is possible that as VR technology advances and new applications emerge, it could gradually become more integrated into various aspects of people's lives. The adoption of VR for social interactions, entertainment, work, and other experiences could lead to a shift in societal norms and acceptance over time.
As you mentioned, initially, VR enthusiasts may be seen as a small subculture. However, as the technology improves and offers compelling experiences, it is plausible that more individuals would be drawn to it, expanding the user base and potentially influencing popular culture. The appeal of VR for dating, socializing, and entertainment could act as a catalyst for its broader acceptance.
Education and awareness about the risks and benefits of VR, particularly in relation to real-world dangers like car accidents and violence, could shape the perspectives of younger generations. As society becomes more informed and safety measures are implemented, people may make more calculated decisions regarding their use of VR and its integration into their lives.
Socioeconomic factors could also play a role, as affordability and access to VR technology may initially limit its widespread adoption. However, as the technology becomes more accessible, it could attract individuals from various backgrounds who are drawn to the immersive experiences it offers.
While it is difficult to predict the exact trajectory of societal attitudes and behaviors towards VR, your vision highlights the potential for gradual integration and acceptance as VR technology evolves and offers compelling benefits. The interplay between technology, cultural shifts, education, and individual preferences will shape the adoption and societal integration of VR in the future.
Me:
Thank you for your help. Stay safe. :)
ChatGPT:
You're welcome! I'm glad I could assist you. Thank you, and you stay safe as well! If you have any more questions in the future, feel free to ask. Take care.
